 |
|
- SEARCH: SAVE SMC BLOG INDEX
- SEARCH: SAVE SMC BLOGGER MIRROR
- SEARCH: SAVE SMC BLOG DATABASE
- SEARCH: SAVE SMC LEGAL DATABASE
- GO TO: SAVE SMC HOME PAGE
- READ OUR: MISSION STATEMENT
- GO TO: AET VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
- GO TO: SANTA MONICA COLLEGE
- VIEW: SMC AET PROFILES
- VIEW: JIM KEESHEN'S PROFILE
- VIDEO GAME NEWS: PHOENIX GENESIS
The SAVE SMC Blog and Website are not affiliated with nor endorsed by Santa Monica College or SMC's Academy of Entertainment and Technology (AET) vocational school.
SAVE SMC - Politics Legal News Media Blog Video Games Animation Academy of Entertainment & Technology Santa Monica College California Public Records Act Education Phoenix Genesis Weblog
The rattlesnake "may therefore be esteemed an emblem of vigilance. ... She never begins an attack, nor, when once engaged, ever surrenders: She is therefore an emblem of magnanimity and true courage. ... she never wounds 'till she has generously given notice, even to her enemy, and cautioned him against the danger of treading on her."
-- An American Guesser [1775]
"The true story of Santa Monica College under the current administration and the current
Board of Trustees is a cautionary tale for the future of publicly funded institutions of higher education."
-- CSEA Accreditation Self Study Addendum [2004]
"Des Manttari is a tenacious defender of the rights of Santa Monica College students to be safe on campus, to their right to know..." -- Jeff Higley, Activist
Through his companies, Jim Keeshen Productions and Studio Animatics, SMC Professor James Keeshen recruited both students and faculty to the AET vocational program for his own bidding as cheap slave labor while outsourcing animation work to Korea for his Day of the Dead animated short film. Read more...
SHOCKING COURT RECORDS
"The Complaint contains allegations of misappropriation of student funds and property, illegal fees, abuse of process, and various unconstitutional activities by Defendants with the goal of suppressing dissent and avoiding auditing and oversight by non-conspirators. The Defendants have a history of such activities. The findings of the PERB were that the Santa Monica Community College District, which would include all defendants in this case, were found to have violated state statutes regarding expenditure of funds and activities undertaken to intimidate and suppress the faculty's opposition to the administration."
"Defendants have obtained this control through racketeering activities, including but not limited to: (a) The extortion of property, such as restricted accounts for the defendants' personal use. (b) Robbery or the conversion of Student funds. (c) Bribery of student officials. (d) As well as multiple violations of the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) that include (i) exerting outside pressure through undue influence and coercision so as to control business decisions, and (ii), the taking of the Student bookstore and other commerce. Defendants' acts of racketeering activity have been unceasing for over fifteen (15) years."
-- Associated Students of Santa Monica College, et. al. vs. Santa Monica Community College District Board of Trustees, KCRW, Herb Roney, Dorothy Ehrhart-Morrison, Illona Katz, Piedad Robertson, Thomas Donner, Robert Sammis, Charlie Yen, Robert Adams, Cheryl Miller, Mark Romano, Eileen Miller, Mark Kessler, Charles Bays, et. al.
Legal Primer on Access to Public Information
Here's a bit of law to help you understand your rights to public information in the State of California. You can click on the name of each Act or Law to go directly to the full citation.
THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Cal. Gov. Code Section 6250. In enacting this chapter, the Legislature, mindful of the right of individuals to privacy, finds and declares that access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state.
Cal. Gov. Code Section 54950. In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly. The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.
THE BAGLEY-KEENE OPEN MEETING ACT
Cal. Gov. Code Section 11120. It is the public policy of this state that public agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business and the proceedings of public agencies be conducted openly so that the public may remain informed. In enacting this article the Legislature finds and declares that it is the intent of the law that actions of state agencies be taken openly and that their deliberation be conducted openly. The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.
In addition to the statutory California Government Codes cited, supra, access to public information is a constitutional right as set forth, infra.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 3.
(a) The people have the right to instruct their representatives, petition government for redress of grievances, and assemble freely to consult for the common good.
(b) (1) The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business, and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.
(2) A statute, court rule, or other authority, including those in effect on the effective date of this subdivision, shall be broadly construed if it furthers the people's right of access, and narrowly construed if it limits the right of access. A statute, court rule, or other authority adopted after the effective date of this subdivision that limits the right of access shall be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
(3) Nothing in this subdivision supersedes or modifies the right of privacy guaranteed by Section 1 or affects the construction of any statute, court rule, or other authority to the extent that it protects that right to privacy, including any statutory procedures governing discovery or disclosure of information concerning the official performance or professional qualifications of a peace officer.
Also, you can check out a vast wealth of information on this excellent site: CFAC: California First Amendment Coalition.
-- Des Manttari,
Editor-in-Chief,
Phoenix Genesis
(c) 2006: Phoenix Genesis/MBS LP
Feel free to link or print this; just include the SAVE SMC URL:
http://www.vtutorials.com/clients/des/savesmc/
Technorati Tags: legal, fundamental rights, legal primer, public information, access to information, weblog, News and politics, Phoenix Genesis, California Public Records Act, public servants, public officials, public agencies, Declaration of Rights, California Constitution, Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code
Go back to: SAVE SMC Blog Index or go to: TOP.